Catholics lose fight to stop gays from adopting

Adoption agency Catholic Care has lost its appeal against discrimination laws in the highest court of England

Catholics lose fight to stop gays from adopting
03 November 2012

A Roman Catholic charity has lost their fight to stop gay people from adopting from their agency.

UK-based adoption agency Catholic Care had gone to the Upper Tribunal to sanction its belief in refusing same-sex couples as potential parents.

However the Charity Commission, the regulator for charities in England and Wales, has insisted Catholic Care’s stance is ‘divisive, capricious and arbitrary’, and demeaning to the dignity of gay couples.

Yesterday (2 November), the commission won the debate when the tribunal ruled Catholic Care had failed to come up with ‘weighty and convincing reasons’ why it should be allowed to discriminate.

In a statement, Catholic Care said it will now be forced to close its adoption service.

‘The reason for this is that the service permitted by the current constitution is in conflict with the aims of the charity,’ they said.

‘It is Catholic Care’s view that this will reduce the number of adoptive parents available and the number of children left waiting for adoptive parents will continue to increase.’

The organization argued children would be the ‘losers’ in the situation because donations would inevitably dry up.

Emma Dixon, from the commission, said Catholic Care’s views were in clear violation of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights which outlaws discrimination on sexual orientation.

She said, if the agency won the argument, it would allow other charities to ‘engage in acts of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics, on the bases only of the irrational or bigoted prejudices of its donors.’

Dixon added: ‘A requirement to operate within the tenets of the Church cannot constitute Article 14 justification.

‘To do so would be to offer protection to the substance of the Church’s belief that homosexuality is sinful.

‘To do so would not only be divisive, capricious and arbitrary, it would be excluding from assessment couples whose personal qualities and aptitude for childrearing is beyond question.’

HAVE YOUR SAY

MORE TOP STORIES

Gay talent George Michael, Jessie J and Pet Shop Boys help close Olympics

Gay talent George Michael, Jessie J and Pet Shop Boys help close Olympics

London closes 2012 Summer Olympic games with a celebration of British music talent including top gay and bisexual names
No thumbnail available

Naked man shot after chewing off another man's face

Nude attacker makes a meal out of suspected homeless man's face in Miami, Florida
No thumbnail available
No thumbnail available

Who is Australia's entry for the Eurovision Song Contest?

It might not be a Minogue, but what do you think of the pick?
No thumbnail available

Gay icon Barbra Streisand makes more history with latest album

Partners becomes singer's 52nd gold record -  more than any other female artist in history
No thumbnail available

University slammed for allowing anti-gay Muslim cleric to speak

Britain's Brunel University under fire as hate preacher given platform to speak
No thumbnail available

Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton and his sons support gay marriage

They are raising money to defeat anti-gay amendment on state ballot this November 
No thumbnail available

Bhutan lama: Lesbians probably reach enlightenment first

Buddhist teacher compares sexual orientation to liking different cheeses
No thumbnail available

England and Wales gay marriage bill could be delayed up to two years

Tory party in-fighting and an amendment giving straight couples civil partnerships could delay the equal marriage bill until after the next election
No thumbnail available

Backlash over South Africa newspaper’s gay wedding front page

The Herald Weekend Post published a photo for Valentine's Day celebrating a same-sex marriage, and it caused a huge uproar among the readers