Costa Rican lawyers claim ‘accidental’ bill does nothing for same-sex unions

Constitutional lawyers say that same-sex couples still lack the ‘legal capacity’ to enter into any type of civil unions.

Costa Rican lawyers claim ‘accidental’ bill does nothing for same-sex unions
06 July 2013

Experts claim Costa Rica is no closer to allowing same-sex unions.

In a landmark ‘mistake’ this week, 45 Costa Rican politicians unknowingly approved a bill some believe could be a legal gateway to same-sex partnerships.

According to Costa Rican newspaper La Nación which broke the story earlier this week, lawyers Marvin Carvajal, Rubén Hernández and Pedro Beirute along with Judge Hector Amoretti believe that a ‘legal capacity’ clause in the new bill will hinder the wording from applying to same-sex couples. 

The text, included in Paragraph 4 of the Law of Young People, recognizes ‘the right to recognition without discrimination contrary to human dignity, social and economic effects of domestic partnerships that constitute publicly, notoriously unique and stable, with legal capacity for marriage for more than three years’.

The legal capacity, however, has been established Paragraph 6 of Article 14 of the Family Code, which by law prohibits the marriage between people of the same sex.

The attorneys suggest that the amendments to the Law of Young People do not in effect change Article 242, which states that only a man and a woman can possess the ‘legal capacity’ to marry, or also enter into a civil partnership with all the corresponding rights and benefits. 

The new bill, already signed by president Laura Chinchilla, is now at the center of a legal and political debate as to whether or not the controversial wording has any standing to legalize same-sex partnerships.

Politicians begged Chinchilla to veto the very bill they had approved, but the Costa Rican president said: ‘No, we’re going to go forward and I will sign this law.

‘We understand that the debate is over how some interpret the law and this alone is not sufficient for the executive to veto the law.’

Moving forward, Judge Amoretti said individual case analyses will have to consider which elements hold more weight: the legal capacity to marry or the legal protection from discrimination.
 

HAVE YOUR SAY

MORE TOP STORIES

No thumbnail available

The rise and rise of the anti-gay religious right

The religious right is on the move against LGBTI people and not just in Russia and Uganda but everywhere from Georgia to the UK, warns Garry Otton
No thumbnail available

Barbra Streisand reveals she and son Jason Gould will record a duet

They last worked together in the film The Prince of Tides
No thumbnail available

Meghan McCain says she is not a lesbian

But outspoken daughter of US Sen. John McCain remains very pro-gay
No thumbnail available

AP’s ban on word ‘homophobia’ is discouraging

Rev Irene Monroe says Associated Press have got it wrong with their decision to drop journalistic use of the word ‘homophobia’ as it is not a medical condition
No thumbnail available

US gays join Russian campaign against propaganda law

Gay rights advocates in San Francisco, California, are the latest LGBT Americans and allies to protest Russia's gay gag law with a photo campaign
No thumbnail available

Gay hate crime condemned by hip hop fans

A cowardly attack with a taser gun on an American gay couple has been condemned by hip hop fans  – with even some self confessed homophobes condemning the attack
No thumbnail available

Gay ex-aide to London mayor not guilty in ‘extreme porn’ case

Openly gay barrister Simon Walsh found not guilty of all six charges in bondage image case
No thumbnail available

Gay man thrown off cliff by ISIS

Islamic extremist group has murdered several LGBTI people
No thumbnail available

San Diego man pleads guilty to spreading HIV

Defendant bragged about giving people his 'positive load'
No thumbnail available

Colorado baker did not discriminate against Christian customer

William Jack wanted a Bible shaped cake that said 'Homosexuality is a detestable sin. Leviticus 18:2'